Opinion essay about smoking in public places

The issue now turns on whether the smokers are harming the nonsmokers. Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby.

Smoking in Public Places

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. These are harmful substances like formaldehyde is a preservative for dead bodies, ammonia in fertilizers, pesticides, and detergents and toluene in gasoline, and anti-freeze.

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. A leading cause of asthma that leads to high hospitalization for children is in-fact second- hand smoking. In order to prepare an argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer must consider several factors: Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.

Another point the argumentative essay should explain is whether there is any law that forbids smokers from using cigarettes in public.

Governments raise enormous amounts of tax on cigarette sales, hundreds of thousands of people work in the cigarette industry directly and millions indirectly. It is emotive, and controversial.

Background It is important that this distinction between activity and passivity not be confused with the more controversial distinction between doing something to another and letting something happen to another.

Individual Project 5 You are harming other people while you smoke around them. If harm is indeed being caused, public policy should prevent the smoker from smoking in this room. Another argument I have against public smoking is health.

One can also add the major economic consequences of smoking and not smoking. Brodish Nonsmokers often question the rationality of smoking at public places in light of these enormous health risks: This is an offense to, or intrusion upon, the nonsmoker, rather than an obvious harm, so it is unlikely that we are going to get a straightforward application of the harm principle.

Consider a nonsmoker in his own home. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree.


If you continue to consume obacco you will lose, a healthy heart, healthy lungs, healthy body, control, up to 15 years average health, and many more. Smoking has a huge effect in people and this is a matter that needs to be handled seriously.

The third involves the long-term risk of disease caused by repeated exposure to secondhand smoke; let us call this the level of disease. If the ingredients inside tobacco are burned they are even more deadly and harmful. The relevance of this distinction is often debated in the context of euthanasia.

This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development. Tobacco is made with extremely harmful substances, such as pesticides, carbon monoxide and nicotine that is a drug.

As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Smoke is annoying when one would simply prefer not to breathe it. More than 40 chemicals cause heart disease lung disease, and cancer in people.

On the condition that they are causing harm, the smokers are obliged to refrain from smoking, and this remains true even if those doing the harm are unaware of the harm they are causing.

Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. The writer needs to read extensively relevant materials that explain what the law of the land is regarding smoking.

Model Answer Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. There are at least three levels on which smoking may harm nonsmokers. Feinberg This places a burden on smokers to change their behavior to comply with the rights of nonsmokers.

When I say that smoking is bad for everyone, I mean everyone including people who do not smoke. Following such steps will help you write a powerful and successful essay. Smoking should be stopped because it wastes a lot of money, and is very addictive.Then a variety of arguments for smoking in public places presented.

The underlying aim of this paper is to provide a moral guide to the formation of a public policy toward smoking behavior. Such a policy, paper will argue, is likely to have as its consequence the elimination of nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke.

Smoking IN public places essays For a long time now many people have different views about smoking in public places.

Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they want. On the other hand non-smokers feel smokers violate their rights and endanger there life. Smoking causes hea. Smoking in Public Places; Smoking in Public Places. 2 February Smoking; This an essay about how people’s bad habits can get them banned from public places, aka smoking.

This essay’s issue is about smoking banned in most of all public places. There is no point in endangering your health and also someone else’s in these public places.

Secondly, it will help public places be less toxic and we won't have to deal with pollution. Finally, It could also help some people quit smoking. If people were allowed to smoke in public places they may not be as motivated to stop smoking as they are with not being allowed to smoke in public areas.

Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Essay Essay on The Ripple Effect of Smoking The Ripple Effect of Smoking It has become common knowledge that smoking is bad for people’s health, nonetheless people continue to smoke.

If smoking is banned in public places it safeguards the life of the smoker as well as that of the public. Studies have shown that second hand smoke kills. Second hand smoke causes sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), respiratory infections and .

Opinion essay about smoking in public places
Rated 4/5 based on 36 review